简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Federal court finalizes $3.4M penalty and lifetime ban in Daniel Winston LaMarco Ponzi-style forex case; CFTC highlights investor protection and enforcement.
A federal court in New York entered final judgment against Daniel Winston LaMarco, imposing $3,450,400 in monetary relief and permanently banning him from all commodity-related activity for orchestrating a Ponzi-style foreign exchange scheme. The order requires $862,600 in restitution to victims and a $2,587,800 civil monetary penalty, closing the Commodity Futures Trading Commissions seven-year enforcement action that began in July 2017.
Judge Diane Gujarati of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York adopted findings that LaMarco committed forex fraud and commodity pool operator fraud, and entered a permanent injunction barring future violations of the Commodity Exchange Act. The final judgment followed a series of rulings, including a September 4, 2024, summary judgment on liability and a July 10, 2025, remedies order, both tied to Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks recommendations.
According to the court record, LaMarco solicited nearly $1.5 million from friends and acquaintances to trade forex contracts via a commodity pool run through GDLogix, Inc., then lost nearly all of it through personal trading while diverting about $630,050 as purported profits to earlier participants in a Ponzi-like fashion. The court concluded he misappropriated funds, made material misrepresentations, and conducted no trading on behalf of pool participants, despite issuing false monthly statements.
GDLogix, Inc., LaMarco‘s company, received a parallel default judgment imposing identical monetary penalties—$862,600 restitution and $2,587,800 in civil penalties—along with permanent registration and trading bans. The corporate default was entered after GDLogix failed to retain counsel and respond, with the court granting the CFTC’s default request and later imposing final remedies.
In addition to remedies for fraud, the court sanctioned LaMarco in June 2025 for filing repetitive defamatory allegations against the CFTC and threatening agency counsel, striking portions of his filings and finding his conduct inexcusable and in bad faith. Those sanctions factored into the courts assessment of his litigation behavior and reinforced the need for permanent injunctive relief.
The civil judgment follows LaMarcos related criminal case, in which he pleaded guilty to commodities fraud and wire fraud and received a 42-month prison sentence with $872,600 in restitution on February 3, 2017. The CFTC reiterated that restitution orders may not result in recovery if a defendant lacks assets, but emphasized ongoing enforcement to protect customers and ensure accountability.
These outcomes demonstrate how courts and the CFTC respond to Ponzi-style foreign exchange scheme conviction matters, combining restitution-focused remedies with protective injunctions to safeguard investors and preserve market integrity.
Stay tuned for the latest news from the financial authority to stay vigilant. Scan the QR code below to download and install the WikiFX app on your smartphone.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Is your forex trading experience with Bybit far from ideal? Do you continue to face withdrawal denials? Does Bybit ban your account without any reason? Have you failed to receive the reward on winning the trading challenges? We must say, you have made the wrong move by partnering with Bybit, which has been scamming traders. In this article, we will share multiple complaints that traders have made against the scam forex broker. Keep reading!
Have you made profits using the copy trade strategy implemented by Advanced Markets? But did the withdrawal stop as the company cited questionable trades? Have you failed to receive any email from this broker regarding the investigation it claimed? Are high slippages and trade losses regular with Advanced Markets? These are nothing but scams. Many traders have openly criticized the UK-based broker for these suspicious forex trading activities. In this article, we will share trader comments against the broker. Keep reading!
While you are free to choose the broker that suits your needs, it is crucial to remain cautious during the selection process. Many brokers may appear genuine at first glance, but in reality, they operate fraudulently. SimplyFX is one such broker that raises serious concerns. Read this article to understand why we consider SimplyFX to be a potential scam broker.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a warning against ten unregulated brokers to raise public awareness and issue a scam alert. This is because the number of scam brokers is increasing in the forex market. You need to be informed when investing in the forex market.